practical-tutorials/project-based-learning vs sindresorhus/awesome
sindresorhus/awesome shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, awesome shows healthier maintenance signals than project-based-learning. awesome rates Healthy overall while project-based-learning rates Mixed. project-based-learning last saw a commit 2 months ago with 37+ active contributors, while awesome was committed to 2 weeks ago with 70+ active contributors. project-based-learning is MIT-licensed while awesome is CC0-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
practical-tutorials/project-based-learning
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
test evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠Could not verify tests from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓37+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sindresorhus/awesome
Strong maintenance signals
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓70+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 26% of recent commits)
- ✓CC0-1.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| project-based-learning | awesome | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 271,965 | 505,816 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 14d ago |
| License | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Open issues | 291 | 106 |
| Has tests | Unknown | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? practical-tutorials/project-based-learning · sindresorhus/awesome
Ask AI about practical-tutorials/project-based-learning vs sindresorhus/awesome
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.