priler/jarvis vs ruvnet/ruview
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, jarvis and ruview both show mixed maintenance signals. jarvis last saw a commit 6 months ago with 7+ active contributors, while ruview was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
priler/jarvis
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 92% of recent commits; CI evidence incomplete…
CI evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
CI evidence incomplete; license evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ruvnet/ruview
Mixed signals — read the receipts
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| jarvis | ruview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 2,785 | 92,443 |
| Last commit | 6mo ago | 10d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 14 | 613 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 6% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 1 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? priler/jarvis · ruvnet/ruview
Ask AI about priler/jarvis vs ruvnet/ruview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.