proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, proxyee-down and guide-rpc-framework both show mixed maintenance signals. proxyee-down last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors, while guide-rpc-framework last saw a commit 9 months ago with 22+ active contributors. proxyee-down is Apache-2.0-licensed while guide-rpc-framework is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 7mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| proxyee-down | guide-rpc-framework | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,751 | 4,419 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 9mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 214 | 23 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 66% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down · snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Ask AI about proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs snailclimb/guide-rpc-framework
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.