proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs wequick/small
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, proxyee-down and small both show mixed maintenance signals. proxyee-down last saw a commit 2 years ago with 7+ active contributors, while small last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wequick/small
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; top contributor handles 95% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| proxyee-down | small | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,751 | 5,030 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 214 | 262 |
| Has tests | Unknown | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down · wequick/small
Ask AI about proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs wequick/small
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.