proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs wyouflf/xutils3
proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, proxyee-down shows stronger maintenance signals than xutils3. proxyee-down rates Mixed overall while xutils3 rates Concerns. proxyee-down last saw a commit 1 year ago with 7+ active contributors, while xutils3 last saw a commit 4 years ago with 1+ active contributor. proxyee-down is Apache-2.0-licensed while xutils3 is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wyouflf/xutils3 →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 4y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 4y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| proxyee-down | xutils3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,751 | 5,951 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 214 | 38 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down · wyouflf/xutils3
Ask AI about proxyee-down-org/proxyee-down vs wyouflf/xutils3
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.