prusa3d/prusaslicer vs tensorflow/tensorflow
tensorflow/tensorflow shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, tensorflow shows healthier maintenance signals than prusaslicer. tensorflow rates Healthy overall while prusaslicer rates Mixed. prusaslicer last saw a commit 2 months ago with 10+ active contributors, while tensorflow was committed to today with 38+ active contributors. prusaslicer is AGPL-3.0-licensed while tensorflow is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
prusa3d/prusaslicer →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 51% of recent commits
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tensorflow/tensorflow →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓38+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| prusaslicer | tensorflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 8,999 | 195,929 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | today |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 5,584 | 3,244 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? prusa3d/prusaslicer · tensorflow/tensorflow
Ask AI about prusa3d/prusaslicer vs tensorflow/tensorflow
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.