ql-win/quicklook vs sta/websocket-sharp
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, quicklook and websocket-sharp both show mixed maintenance signals. quicklook was committed to 2 weeks ago with 7+ active contributors, while websocket-sharp last saw a commit 4 months ago with 1+ active contributor. quicklook is GPL-3.0-licensed while websocket-sharp is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ql-win/quicklook
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
copyleft license (GPL-3.0) — review compatibility; top contributor handles 92% of recent commits…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10…
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 92% of recent commits
- ⚠GPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓7 active contributors
- ✓GPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
sta/websocket-sharp
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); test evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
CI evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ✓Last commit 3w ago
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| quicklook | websocket-sharp | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,614 | 6,058 |
| Last commit | 15d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 201 | 559 |
| Has tests | No | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? ql-win/quicklook · sta/websocket-sharp
Ask AI about ql-win/quicklook vs sta/websocket-sharp
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.