quantopian/zipline vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
significant-gravitas/autogpt shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, autogpt shows healthier maintenance signals than zipline. autogpt rates Healthy overall while zipline rates Mixed. zipline last saw a commit 2 years ago with 12+ active contributors, while autogpt was committed to today with 16+ active contributors. zipline is Apache-2.0-licensed while autogpt is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
quantopian/zipline →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
significant-gravitas/autogpt →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| zipline | autogpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,765 | 185,180 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | today |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 370 | 449 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 82% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? quantopian/zipline · significant-gravitas/autogpt
Ask AI about quantopian/zipline vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.