RepoPilot

querz/mcaselector vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than mcaselector. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while mcaselector rates Mixed. mcaselector last saw a commit 2 months ago with 6+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

querz/mcaselector

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 95% of recent commits; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 4w ago
  • 6 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit 1d ago
  • 5 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

mcaselectorruoyi-vue-pro
Stars4,45237,021
Last commit2mo ago1mo ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues2273
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%32%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? querz/mcaselector · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Ask AI about querz/mcaselector vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.