qwikdev/qwik vs wandb/openui
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
qwikdev/qwik →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wandb/openui →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 3mo ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
Show 5 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 3mo ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| qwik | openui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,001 | 22,305 |
| Last commit | 6d ago | 3mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 122 | 84 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 19% | 7% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? qwikdev/qwik · wandb/openui
Ask AI about qwikdev/qwik vs wandb/openui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.