radix-ui/primitives vs yangshun/tech-interview-handbook
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, primitives and tech-interview-handbook both show healthy maintenance signals. primitives last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while tech-interview-handbook last saw a commit 1 month ago with 49+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
radix-ui/primitives
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ✓Used by 1 trusted project: shadcn-ui/ui
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
yangshun/tech-interview-handbook
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓49+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 33% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| primitives | tech-interview-handbook | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,186 | 142,572 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 340 | 37 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 22% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? radix-ui/primitives · yangshun/tech-interview-handbook
Ask AI about radix-ui/primitives vs yangshun/tech-interview-handbook
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.