raphw/byte-buddy vs wuyouzhuguli/springall
raphw/byte-buddy shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, byte-buddy shows healthier maintenance signals than springall. byte-buddy rates Healthy overall while springall rates Mixed. byte-buddy last saw a commit 1 month ago with 4+ active contributors, while springall last saw a commit 2 years ago with 3+ active contributors. byte-buddy is Apache-2.0-licensed while springall is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
raphw/byte-buddy →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
wuyouzhuguli/springall →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓3 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| byte-buddy | springall | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 6,822 | 28,986 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 33 | 35 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 30% | 28% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? raphw/byte-buddy · wuyouzhuguli/springall
Ask AI about raphw/byte-buddy vs wuyouzhuguli/springall
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.