rathole-org/rathole vs ruvnet/ruview
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, rathole and ruview both show mixed maintenance signals. rathole was committed to 3 weeks ago with 24+ active contributors, while ruview was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. rathole is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruview is MIT-licensed. ruview has no known critical CVEs, while rathole has 1.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
rathole-org/rathole
High-severity dependency advisories — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
1 high-severity CVE in dependencies; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10…
- ⚠1 high-severity advisory on direct dependencies
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 68% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 2w ago
- ✓24+ active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: resolve the high-severity advisory; bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
ruvnet/ruview
Mixed signals — read the receipts
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; 1 cyclic import chain detected
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 71% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rathole | ruview | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 14,113 | 92,443 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 13d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 95 | 613 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 89% | 24% |
| Dependency CVEs | 0 critical · 1 high · 5 moderate · 0 low | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | A |
| Cycles | 8 | 1 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? rathole-org/rathole · ruvnet/ruview
Ask AI about rathole-org/rathole vs ruvnet/ruview
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.