reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa vs roberthein/bouncylayout
reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, reactivecocoa shows healthier maintenance signals than bouncylayout. reactivecocoa rates Healthy overall while bouncylayout rates Mixed. reactivecocoa last saw a commit 9 months ago with 23+ active contributors, while bouncylayout last saw a commit 5 years ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 23% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
roberthein/bouncylayout →
Stale — last commit 6y ago
last commit was 6y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 6y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 6y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 85% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| reactivecocoa | bouncylayout | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,845 | 4,248 |
| Last commit | 9mo ago | 5y ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 11 | 14 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa · roberthein/bouncylayout
Ask AI about reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa vs roberthein/bouncylayout
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.