reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa vs swiftlang/swift-format
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, reactivecocoa and swift-format both show healthy maintenance signals. reactivecocoa last saw a commit 9 months ago with 23+ active contributors, while swift-format last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors. reactivecocoa is MIT-licensed while swift-format is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 23% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
swiftlang/swift-format →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 32% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| reactivecocoa | swift-format | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,845 | 2,911 |
| Last commit | 9mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 11 | 158 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa · swiftlang/swift-format
Ask AI about reactivecocoa/reactivecocoa vs swiftlang/swift-format
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.