reactivex/rxandroid vs sshahine/jfoenix
reactivex/rxandroid shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxandroid shows healthier maintenance signals than jfoenix. rxandroid rates Healthy overall while jfoenix rates Mixed. rxandroid last saw a commit 3 months ago with 17+ active contributors, while jfoenix last saw a commit 3 years ago with 23+ active contributors. rxandroid is Apache-2.0-licensed while jfoenix is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
reactivex/rxandroid →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 6w ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sshahine/jfoenix →
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓23+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 38% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rxandroid | jfoenix | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,975 | 6,339 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 3y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 1 | 133 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? reactivex/rxandroid · sshahine/jfoenix
Ask AI about reactivex/rxandroid vs sshahine/jfoenix
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.