RepoPilot

reactivex/rxandroid vs wasabeef/android-gpuimage

reactivex/rxandroid shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, rxandroid shows healthier maintenance signals than android-gpuimage. rxandroid rates Healthy overall while android-gpuimage rates Concerns. rxandroid last saw a commit 3 months ago with 17+ active contributors, while android-gpuimage last saw a commit 3 years ago with 14+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

reactivex/rxandroid

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
  • Last commit 6w ago
  • 17 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

wasabeef/android-gpuimage

Concerns

Stale and unlicensed — last commit 4y ago

ConcernsDependency

no license — legally unclear; last commit was 4y ago…

ConcernsFork & modify

no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

ConcernsDeploy as-is

no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 4y ago…

  • Stale — last commit 4y ago
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 55% of recent commits
  • No license — legally unclear to depend on
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • 14 active contributors

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
  • Fork & modify ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file
  • Deploy as-is ConcernsMixed if: add a LICENSE file

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rxandroidandroid-gpuimage
Stars19,9759,156
Last commit3mo ago3y ago
LicenseApache-2.0
Open issues1347
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage100%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsConcerns signals

Want the full analysis? reactivex/rxandroid · wasabeef/android-gpuimage

Ask AI about reactivex/rxandroid vs wasabeef/android-gpuimage

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.