reactivex/rxswift vs sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui
reactivex/rxswift shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxswift shows healthier maintenance signals than moderncleanarchitectureswiftui. rxswift rates Healthy overall while moderncleanarchitectureswiftui rates Concerns. rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors, while moderncleanarchitectureswiftui last saw a commit 1 year ago with 22+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 1y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 1y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 1y ago
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓22+ active contributors
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rxswift | moderncleanarchitectureswiftui | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,644 | 4,096 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | — |
| Open issues | 10 | 2 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? reactivex/rxswift · sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui
Ask AI about reactivex/rxswift vs sergdort/moderncleanarchitectureswiftui
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.