reactivex/rxswift vs twostraws/hackingwithswift
reactivex/rxswift shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, rxswift shows healthier maintenance signals than hackingwithswift. rxswift rates Healthy overall while hackingwithswift rates Mixed. rxswift last saw a commit 2 months ago with 45+ active contributors, while hackingwithswift last saw a commit 1 year ago with 13+ active contributors. rxswift is MIT-licensed while hackingwithswift is Unlicense-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
reactivex/rxswift →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit 5w ago
- ✓45+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 42% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
twostraws/hackingwithswift →
Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 11mo ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 11mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 74% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 11mo ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓Unlicense licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rxswift | hackingwithswift | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24,644 | 6,306 |
| Last commit | 2mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | MIT | Unlicense |
| Open issues | 10 | 19 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | — | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? reactivex/rxswift · twostraws/hackingwithswift
Ask AI about reactivex/rxswift vs twostraws/hackingwithswift
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.