redwoodjs/redwood vs tanstack/query
redwoodjs/redwood shows stronger signals overall
As of July 2026, redwood shows healthier maintenance signals than query. redwood rates Healthy overall while query rates Mixed. redwood was committed to 5 days ago with 16+ active contributors, while query was committed to today with 18+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
redwoodjs/redwood
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tanstack/query
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| redwood | query | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 17,614 | 49,974 |
| Last commit | 5d ago | today |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 266 | 191 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 3% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? redwoodjs/redwood · tanstack/query
Ask AI about redwoodjs/redwood vs tanstack/query
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.