RepoPilot

redwoodjs/redwood vs withastro/astro

withastro/astro shows stronger signals overall

As of September 2026, astro shows healthier maintenance signals than redwood. astro rates Healthy overall while redwood rates Mixed. redwood last saw a commit 1 month ago with 16+ active contributors, while astro was committed to 6 days ago with 18+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

redwoodjs/redwood

Mixed

Open vulnerabilities flagged by OpenSSF Scorecard

MixedDependency

dependency CVE scan unavailable

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

dependency CVE scan unavailable

  • Scorecard: known vulnerabilities detected (scored 0/10 by OpenSSF)
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 16 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

withastro/astro

Healthy

Healthy across all four use cases

HealthyDependency

No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.

HealthyFork & modify

No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.

  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • 1 moderate-severity advisory on direct dependencies
  • In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
  • Last commit today
  • 18 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 30% of recent commits)
  • MIT licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard

Signal-by-signal breakdown

redwoodastro
Stars17,61162,445
Last commit1mo ago6d ago
LicenseMITMIT
Open issues279111
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage45%100%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEs0 critical · 0 high · 1 moderate · 0 low
Architecture gradeA
Cycles0
Bottom-lineMixed signalsHealthy signals

Want the full analysis? redwoodjs/redwood · withastro/astro

Ask AI about redwoodjs/redwood vs withastro/astro

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.