remix-run/react-router vs ruvnet/ruflo
remix-run/react-router shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, react-router shows healthier maintenance signals than ruflo. react-router rates Healthy overall while ruflo rates Mixed. react-router was committed to 4 days ago with 21+ active contributors, while ruflo was committed to 2 days ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
remix-run/react-router →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ✓Used by 1 trusted project: remix-run/remix
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓21+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
ruvnet/ruflo →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 95% of recent commits; no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 95% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| react-router | ruflo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 56,443 | 58,419 |
| Last commit | 4d ago | 2d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 140 | 629 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 21% | — |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | C |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? remix-run/react-router · ruvnet/ruflo
Ask AI about remix-run/react-router vs ruvnet/ruflo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.