rtk-ai/rtk vs ruffle-rs/ruffle
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, rtk and ruffle both show healthy maintenance signals. rtk last saw a commit 1 month ago with 18+ active contributors, while ruffle last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors. rtk is Apache-2.0-licensed while ruffle is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
rtk-ai/rtk →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
ruffle-rs/ruffle →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 37% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rtk | ruffle | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,729 | 18,043 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 829 | 5,741 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 21% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? rtk-ai/rtk · ruffle-rs/ruffle
Ask AI about rtk-ai/rtk vs ruffle-rs/ruffle
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.