rtk-ai/rtk vs tw93/pake
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
rtk-ai/rtk →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓18 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
Show 3 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tw93/pake →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
Show 4 more →Show less
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 73% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| rtk | pake | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 43,729 | 48,589 |
| Last commit | 7d ago | 5d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 829 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 21% | 42% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? rtk-ai/rtk · tw93/pake
Ask AI about rtk-ai/rtk vs tw93/pake
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.