ruanyf/webpack-demos vs sxei/chrome-plugin-demo
Both showing Concerns signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, webpack-demos and chrome-plugin-demo both show concerning maintenance signals. webpack-demos last saw a commit 5 years ago with 23+ active contributors, while chrome-plugin-demo last saw a commit 3 years ago with 3+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ruanyf/webpack-demos →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 5y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 5y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 5y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 5y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓23+ active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
sxei/chrome-plugin-demo →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 3y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 3y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 3y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓3 active contributors
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Maintenance signals: commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests + OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| webpack-demos | chrome-plugin-demo | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 9,572 | 8,679 |
| Last commit | 5y ago | 3y ago |
| License | — | — |
| Open issues | 0 | 32 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? ruanyf/webpack-demos · sxei/chrome-plugin-demo
Ask AI about ruanyf/webpack-demos vs sxei/chrome-plugin-demo
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.