rubensousa/gravitysnaphelper vs seleniumhq/selenium
seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than gravitysnaphelper. selenium rates Healthy overall while gravitysnaphelper rates Mixed. gravitysnaphelper last saw a commit 3 months ago with 2+ active contributors, while selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
rubensousa/gravitysnaphelper →
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 99% of recent commits; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 2mo ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
seleniumhq/selenium →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| gravitysnaphelper | selenium | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 4,994 | 34,146 |
| Last commit | 3mo ago | 24d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 0 | 186 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? rubensousa/gravitysnaphelper · seleniumhq/selenium
Ask AI about rubensousa/gravitysnaphelper vs seleniumhq/selenium
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.