RepoPilot

ruby/ruby vs rubyonjets/jets

ruby/ruby shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, ruby shows healthier maintenance signals than jets. ruby rates Healthy overall while jets rates Mixed. ruby last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors, while jets last saw a commit 7 months ago with 6+ active contributors. ruby is Other-licensed while jets is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

ruby/ruby

Healthy

Healthy across the board

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other)

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • Last commit today
  • 27+ active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
  • Other licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

rubyonjets/jets

Mixed

Slowing — last commit 6mo ago

MixedDependency

top contributor handles 90% of recent commits; no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

MixedDeploy as-is

last commit was 6mo ago; no CI workflows detected

  • Slowing — last commit 6mo ago
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 90% of recent commits
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Last commit 6mo ago
  • 6 active contributors
  • MIT licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency MixedHealthy if: diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
  • Deploy as-is MixedHealthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

rubyjets
Stars23,5732,594
Last commit1mo ago7mo ago
LicenseOtherMIT
Open issues5857
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage18%13%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? ruby/ruby · rubyonjets/jets

Ask AI about ruby/ruby vs rubyonjets/jets

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.