ruby/ruby vs stefankroes/ancestry
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, ruby and ancestry both show healthy maintenance signals. ruby last saw a commit 1 month ago with 27+ active contributors, while ancestry last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. ruby is Other-licensed while ancestry is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
ruby/ruby →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓27+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 40% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
stefankroes/ancestry →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 99% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 6d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| ruby | ancestry | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 23,573 | 3,858 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 585 | 29 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 18% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? ruby/ruby · stefankroes/ancestry
Ask AI about ruby/ruby vs stefankroes/ancestry
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.