run-llama/llama_index vs scrapegraphai/scrapegraph-ai
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, llama_index and scrapegraph-ai both show healthy maintenance signals. llama_index was committed to 4 weeks ago with 63+ active contributors, while scrapegraph-ai was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors. Both use the MIT license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
run-llama/llama_index
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓63+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 5% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
scrapegraphai/scrapegraph-ai
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1w ago
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 49% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| llama_index | scrapegraph-ai | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 51,739 | 30,545 |
| Last commit | 29d ago | 20d ago |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Open issues | 629 | 14 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 75% | 34% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | A |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? run-llama/llama_index · scrapegraphai/scrapegraph-ai
Ask AI about run-llama/llama_index vs scrapegraphai/scrapegraph-ai
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.