runacapital/awesome-oss-alternatives vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
Both showing Healthy signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, awesome-oss-alternatives and autogpt both show healthy maintenance signals. awesome-oss-alternatives last saw a commit 9 months ago with 40+ active contributors, while autogpt was committed to today with 16+ active contributors. awesome-oss-alternatives is MIT-licensed while autogpt is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
runacapital/awesome-oss-alternatives →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 8mo ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 58% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 8mo ago
- ✓40+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
significant-gravitas/autogpt →
Healthy across the board
non-standard license (Other)
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓16 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 17% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| awesome-oss-alternatives | autogpt | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 19,088 | 185,180 |
| Last commit | 9mo ago | today |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Open issues | 114 | 449 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 2% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? runacapital/awesome-oss-alternatives · significant-gravitas/autogpt
Ask AI about runacapital/awesome-oss-alternatives vs significant-gravitas/autogpt
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.