rust-lang/mdbook vs squidfunk/mkdocs-material
rust-lang/mdbook shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, mdbook shows healthier maintenance signals than mkdocs-material. mdbook rates Healthy overall while mkdocs-material rates Mixed. mdbook was committed to 2 weeks ago with 19+ active contributors, while mkdocs-material was committed to 2 weeks ago with 13+ active contributors. mdbook is MPL-2.0-licensed while mkdocs-material is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
rust-lang/mdbook
Healthy across all four use cases
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No blocking repository-level signals were found; deployment review is still required.
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 36% of recent commits)
- ✓MPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
squidfunk/mkdocs-material
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
no tests detected in the complete Git tree; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 80% of recent commits
- ⚠No tests detected in the complete Git tree
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓13 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| mdbook | mkdocs-material | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 22,104 | 27,342 |
| Last commit | 19d ago | 20d ago |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 668 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | No |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 100% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? rust-lang/mdbook · squidfunk/mkdocs-material
Ask AI about rust-lang/mdbook vs squidfunk/mkdocs-material
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.