schollz/croc vs stashapp/stash
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, croc and stash both show mixed maintenance signals. croc was committed to 1 week ago with 5+ active contributors, while stash last saw a commit 4 months ago with 11+ active contributors. croc is MIT-licensed while stash is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
schollz/croc
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
stashapp/stash
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; test evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Could not verify tests from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit 2d ago
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| croc | stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40,274 | 12,298 |
| Last commit | 9d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 2 | 722 |
| Has tests | ✓ | Unknown |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 68% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | A | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? schollz/croc · stashapp/stash
Ask AI about schollz/croc vs stashapp/stash
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.