schollz/croc vs xiaomi/soar
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, croc and soar both show mixed maintenance signals. croc was committed to 1 week ago with 5+ active contributors, while soar last saw a commit 2 years ago with 10+ active contributors. croc is MIT-licensed while soar is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
schollz/croc
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; Scorecard "Token-Permissions" is 0/10
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: bring "Branch-Protection" to ≥3/10 (see scorecard report)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
xiaomi/soar
Stale — last commit 3y ago
No blocking maintenance, license, or known-CVE signals were found; still verify the package version and fit.
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 87% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ⚠3 moderate-severity advisories on direct dependencies
- ✓10 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against dependency CVEs from deps.dev and OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| croc | soar | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 40,274 | 8,758 |
| Last commit | 8d ago | 2y ago |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 2 | 77 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 68% | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | 0 critical · 0 high · 3 moderate · 0 low |
| Architecture grade | A | A |
| Cycles | 0 | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? schollz/croc · xiaomi/soar
Ask AI about schollz/croc vs xiaomi/soar
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.