scwang90/smartrefreshlayout vs signalapp/signal-server
signalapp/signal-server shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, signal-server shows healthier maintenance signals than smartrefreshlayout. signal-server rates Healthy overall while smartrefreshlayout rates Mixed. smartrefreshlayout last saw a commit 1 year ago with 8+ active contributors, while signal-server was committed to 3 weeks ago with 8+ active contributors. smartrefreshlayout is Apache-2.0-licensed while signal-server is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
scwang90/smartrefreshlayout
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 52% of recent commits
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
signalapp/signal-server
Strong maintenance signals
copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 47% of recent commits)
- ✓AGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Concerns to Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| smartrefreshlayout | signal-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 25,159 | 10,683 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 22d ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Open issues | 341 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 72% | 45% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? scwang90/smartrefreshlayout · signalapp/signal-server
Ask AI about scwang90/smartrefreshlayout vs signalapp/signal-server
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.