seaswalker/spring-analysis vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, ruoyi-vue-pro shows healthier maintenance signals than spring-analysis. ruoyi-vue-pro rates Healthy overall while spring-analysis rates Concerns. spring-analysis last saw a commit 3 years ago with 6+ active contributors, while ruoyi-vue-pro last saw a commit 1 month ago with 5+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
seaswalker/spring-analysis →
Stale and unlicensed — last commit 3y ago
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 3y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 3y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 1d ago
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spring-analysis | ruoyi-vue-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 13,754 | 37,021 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 1mo ago |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 19 | 3 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 26% | 32% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? seaswalker/spring-analysis · yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Ask AI about seaswalker/spring-analysis vs yunaiv/ruoyi-vue-pro
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.