seaswalker/spring-analysis vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of September 2026, spring-analysis and yudao-cloud both show mixed maintenance signals. spring-analysis last saw a commit 3 years ago with 6+ active contributors, while yudao-cloud was committed to 1 week ago with 2+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
seaswalker/spring-analysis
Stale — last commit 3y ago
last commit was 3y ago; top contributor handles 93% of recent commits…
CI evidence incomplete; last commit was 3y ago…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 3y ago; CI evidence incomplete…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 3y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 93% of recent commits
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- •Use as dependency Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; diversify commit ownership (top <90%)
- •Deploy as-is Mixed to Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting
top contributor handles 98% of recent commits; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓2 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| spring-analysis | yudao-cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 13,754 | 19,486 |
| Last commit | 3y ago | 13d ago |
| License | Unknown | MIT |
| Open issues | 19 | 1 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | Unknown | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 26% | 21% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | C |
| Cycles | — | 0 |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? seaswalker/spring-analysis · yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Ask AI about seaswalker/spring-analysis vs yunaiv/yudao-cloud
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.