seleniumhq/selenium vs splware/esproc
seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall
As of September 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than esproc. selenium rates Healthy overall while esproc rates Mixed. selenium was committed to 1 day ago with 11+ active contributors, while esproc last saw a commit 4 months ago with 6+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
seleniumhq/selenium
Strong maintenance signals
dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 67% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
splware/esproc
Evidence incomplete — review before adopting
CI evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
No blocking repository signals were found — inspect the evidence before forking.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
CI evidence incomplete; dependency CVE scan unavailable
- ⚠Could not verify CI from the available repository evidence
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓6 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| selenium | esproc | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,493 | 4,684 |
| Last commit | 1d ago | 4mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 187 | 50 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | Unknown |
| Test coverage | 51% | 83% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? seleniumhq/selenium · splware/esproc
Ask AI about seleniumhq/selenium vs splware/esproc
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.