seleniumhq/selenium vs tencent/qmui_android
seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than qmui_android. selenium rates Healthy overall while qmui_android rates Concerns. selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while qmui_android last saw a commit 1 year ago with 1+ active contributor. selenium is Apache-2.0-licensed while qmui_android is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
seleniumhq/selenium →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
tencent/qmui_android →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 2y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| selenium | qmui_android | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,146 | 14,498 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Open issues | 186 | 427 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 2% | 17% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? seleniumhq/selenium · tencent/qmui_android
Ask AI about seleniumhq/selenium vs tencent/qmui_android
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.