RepoPilot

seleniumhq/selenium vs vedenin/useful-java-links

seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than useful-java-links. selenium rates Healthy overall while useful-java-links rates Mixed. selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while useful-java-links last saw a commit 3 months ago with 22+ active contributors. selenium is Apache-2.0-licensed while useful-java-links is Other-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

seleniumhq/selenium

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
  • Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
  • Last commit today
  • 9 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard

vedenin/useful-java-links

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (Other); no CI workflows detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
  • No CI workflows detected
  • Last commit 7w ago
  • 22+ active contributors
  • Other licensed
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

seleniumuseful-java-links
Stars34,1466,163
Last commit24d ago3mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0Other
Open issues18618
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage2%10%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture gradeC
Cycles0
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? seleniumhq/selenium · vedenin/useful-java-links

Ask AI about seleniumhq/selenium vs vedenin/useful-java-links

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.