seleniumhq/selenium vs wuhaoyu1990/magiccamera
seleniumhq/selenium shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, selenium shows healthier maintenance signals than magiccamera. selenium rates Healthy overall while magiccamera rates Concerns. selenium was committed to 3 weeks ago with 9+ active contributors, while magiccamera last saw a commit 5 years ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
seleniumhq/selenium →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 66% of recent commits
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓9 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
wuhaoyu1990/magiccamera →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 6y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 6y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 6y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| selenium | magiccamera | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 34,146 | 5,513 |
| Last commit | 24d ago | 5y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Open issues | 186 | 100 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 2% | 13% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | C | — |
| Cycles | 0 | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Concerns signals |
Want the full analysis? seleniumhq/selenium · wuhaoyu1990/magiccamera
Ask AI about seleniumhq/selenium vs wuhaoyu1990/magiccamera
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.