shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5 vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
thealgorithms/c-plus-plus shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, c-plus-plus shows healthier maintenance signals than shadowsocks-qt5. c-plus-plus rates Healthy overall while shadowsocks-qt5 rates Mixed. shadowsocks-qt5 last saw a commit 6 years ago with 12+ active contributors, while c-plus-plus last saw a commit 8 months ago with 34+ active contributors. shadowsocks-qt5 is LGPL-3.0-licensed while c-plus-plus is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5 →
Stale — last commit 7y ago
copyleft license (LGPL-3.0) — review compatibility; last commit was 7y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 7y ago
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 81% of recent commits
- ⚠LGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓12 active contributors
- ✓LGPL-3.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
thealgorithms/c-plus-plus →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
- ✓34+ active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 29% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| shadowsocks-qt5 | c-plus-plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 7,942 | 34,206 |
| Last commit | 6y ago | 8mo ago |
| License | LGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 75 | 33 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 0% | 1% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5 · thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
Ask AI about shadowsocks/shadowsocks-qt5 vs thealgorithms/c-plus-plus
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.