shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows vs udacity/self-driving-car-sim
udacity/self-driving-car-sim shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, self-driving-car-sim shows healthier maintenance signals than shadowsocks-windows. self-driving-car-sim rates Healthy overall while shadowsocks-windows rates Mixed. shadowsocks-windows last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors, while self-driving-car-sim last saw a commit 4 years ago with 8+ active contributors. shadowsocks-windows is Other-licensed while self-driving-car-sim is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 1y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
udacity/self-driving-car-sim →
Healthy across all four use cases
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 4y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 50% of recent commits
- ✓8 active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| shadowsocks-windows | self-driving-car-sim | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 59,548 | 3,977 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 4y ago |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Open issues | 200 | 56 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 12% | 8% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows · udacity/self-driving-car-sim
Ask AI about shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows vs udacity/self-driving-car-sim
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.