shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows vs zyperwave/zyperwinoptimize
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, shadowsocks-windows and zyperwinoptimize both show mixed maintenance signals. shadowsocks-windows last saw a commit 1 year ago with 11+ active contributors, while zyperwinoptimize last saw a commit 8 months ago with 1+ active contributor. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
non-standard license (Other); last commit was 1y ago…
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 1y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Non-standard license (Other) — review terms
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓11 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 44% of recent commits)
- ✓Other licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: clarify license terms
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
zyperwave/zyperwinoptimize →
Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
no license — legally unclear; single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible)…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 7mo ago…
- ⚠Slowing — last commit 7mo ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit 7mo ago
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.)
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| shadowsocks-windows | zyperwinoptimize | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 59,548 | 7,574 |
| Last commit | 1y ago | 8mo ago |
| License | Other | — |
| Open issues | 200 | 54 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | — | — |
| Test coverage | 12% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows · zyperwave/zyperwinoptimize
Ask AI about shadowsocks/shadowsocks-windows vs zyperwave/zyperwinoptimize
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.