shadowsocks/shadowsocks vs tiangolo/fastapi
tiangolo/fastapi shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fastapi shows healthier maintenance signals than shadowsocks. fastapi rates Healthy overall while shadowsocks rates Concerns. shadowsocks last saw a commit 2 years ago with 1+ active contributor, while fastapi was committed to today with 5+ active contributors. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
shadowsocks/shadowsocks →
Looks unmaintained — solo project with stale commits
no license — legally unclear; last commit was 2y ago…
no license — can't legally use code; no tests detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
no license — can't legally use code; last commit was 2y ago…
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No license — legally unclear to depend on
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: publish a permissive license (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.); 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Fork & modify Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file; add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Concerns → Mixed if: add a LICENSE file
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tiangolo/fastapi →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ✓In RepoPilot's curated trusted-corpus (29 projects)
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓5 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 48% of recent commits)
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| shadowsocks | fastapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 33,591 | 99,696 |
| Last commit | 2y ago | today |
| License | — | MIT |
| Open issues | 450 | 100 |
| Has tests | — | ✓ |
| Has CI | — | ✓ |
| Test coverage | — | 100% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Concerns signals | Healthy signals |
Want the full analysis? shadowsocks/shadowsocks · tiangolo/fastapi
Ask AI about shadowsocks/shadowsocks vs tiangolo/fastapi
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.