RepoPilot

shadps4-emu/shadps4 vs tdlib/td

Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health

As of June 2026, shadps4 and td both show mixed maintenance signals. shadps4 last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors, while td last saw a commit 1 month ago with 3+ active contributors. shadps4 is GPL-2.0-licensed while td is BSL-1.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

shadps4-emu/shadps4

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit today
  • 19 active contributors
  • Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
  • GPL-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

tdlib/td

Mixed

Single-maintainer risk — review before adopting

ConcernsDependency

non-standard license (BSL-1.0); top contributor handles 98% of recent commits…

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Small team — 3 contributors active in recent commits
  • Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 98% of recent commits
  • Non-standard license (BSL-1.0) — review terms
  • No CI workflows detected
  • No test directory detected
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 3 active contributors
  • BSL-1.0 licensed

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: clarify license terms

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

shadps4td
Stars31,0408,750
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseGPL-2.0BSL-1.0
Open issues13967
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage0%0%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineMixed signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? shadps4-emu/shadps4 · tdlib/td

Ask AI about shadps4-emu/shadps4 vs tdlib/td

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.