shadps4-emu/shadps4 vs thecherno/hazel
Both showing Mixed signals — pick on fit, not health
As of June 2026, shadps4 and hazel both show mixed maintenance signals. shadps4 last saw a commit 1 month ago with 19+ active contributors, while hazel last saw a commit 2 years ago with 26+ active contributors. shadps4 is GPL-2.0-licensed while hazel is Apache-2.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
shadps4-emu/shadps4 →
Mixed signals — read the receipts
copyleft license (GPL-2.0) — review compatibility; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠GPL-2.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓Last commit today
- ✓19 active contributors
- ✓Distributed ownership (top contributor 18% of recent commits)
- ✓GPL-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Concerns → Mixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
thecherno/hazel →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected…
no tests detected; no CI workflows detected…
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; no CI workflows detected
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 63% of recent commits
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ✓26+ active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days; add a test suite
- →Fork & modify Mixed → Healthy if: add a test suite
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| shadps4 | hazel | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 31,040 | 12,978 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 2y ago |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 139 | 136 |
| Has tests | — | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 0% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Mixed signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? shadps4-emu/shadps4 · thecherno/hazel
Ask AI about shadps4-emu/shadps4 vs thecherno/hazel
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.