sharkdp/fd vs tako8ki/awesome-alternatives-in-rust
sharkdp/fd shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fd shows healthier maintenance signals than awesome-alternatives-in-rust. fd rates Healthy overall while awesome-alternatives-in-rust rates Mixed. fd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while awesome-alternatives-in-rust last saw a commit 1 year ago with 29+ active contributors. fd is Apache-2.0-licensed while awesome-alternatives-in-rust is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sharkdp/fd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
tako8ki/awesome-alternatives-in-rust →
Stale — last commit 2y ago
last commit was 2y ago; no tests detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
last commit was 2y ago; Scorecard "Branch-Protection" is 0/10
- ⚠Stale — last commit 2y ago
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 61% of recent commits
- ⚠No test directory detected
- ⚠Scorecard: marked unmaintained (0/10)
- ⚠Scorecard: default branch unprotected (0/10)
- ✓29+ active contributors
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓CI configured
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
- →Deploy as-is Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 180 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests, cross-checked against OpenSSF Scorecard
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fd | awesome-alternatives-in-rust | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42,886 | 4,066 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 182 | 44 |
| Has tests | ✓ | — |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 19% | 0% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sharkdp/fd · tako8ki/awesome-alternatives-in-rust
Ask AI about sharkdp/fd vs tako8ki/awesome-alternatives-in-rust
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.