RepoPilot

sharkdp/fd vs triwinds/ns-emu-tools

sharkdp/fd shows stronger signals overall

As of June 2026, fd shows healthier maintenance signals than ns-emu-tools. fd rates Healthy overall while ns-emu-tools rates Mixed. fd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while ns-emu-tools last saw a commit 1 month ago with 2+ active contributors. fd is Apache-2.0-licensed while ns-emu-tools is AGPL-3.0-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.

Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.

sharkdp/fd

Healthy

Healthy across the board

HealthyDependency

Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
  • Last commit 5d ago
  • 17 active contributors
  • Apache-2.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

triwinds/ns-emu-tools

Mixed

Mixed signals — read the receipts

ConcernsDependency

copyleft license (AGPL-3.0) — review compatibility

HealthyFork & modify

Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.

HealthyLearn from

Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.

HealthyDeploy as-is

No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.

  • Small team — 2 contributors active in recent commits
  • Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 79% of recent commits
  • AGPL-3.0 is copyleft — check downstream compatibility
  • Last commit 2d ago
  • 2 active contributors
  • AGPL-3.0 licensed
  • CI configured
  • Tests present

What would improve this?

  • Use as dependency ConcernsMixed if: relicense under MIT/Apache-2.0 (rare for established libs)

Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests

Signal-by-signal breakdown

fdns-emu-tools
Stars42,8864,876
Last commit1mo ago1mo ago
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
Open issues18217
Has tests
Has CI
Test coverage19%15%
Dependency CVEsNo CVEsNo CVEs
Architecture grade
Cycles
Bottom-lineHealthy signalsMixed signals

Want the full analysis? sharkdp/fd · triwinds/ns-emu-tools

Ask AI about sharkdp/fd vs triwinds/ns-emu-tools

Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.