sharkdp/fd vs whitecat18/rust-for-malware-development
sharkdp/fd shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fd shows healthier maintenance signals than rust-for-malware-development. fd rates Healthy overall while rust-for-malware-development rates Mixed. fd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while rust-for-malware-development last saw a commit 1 month ago with 1+ active contributor. fd is Apache-2.0-licensed while rust-for-malware-development is MIT-licensed. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sharkdp/fd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
whitecat18/rust-for-malware-development →
Solo project — review before adopting
single-maintainer (no co-maintainers visible); no CI workflows detected
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Solo or near-solo (1 contributor active in recent commits)
- ⚠No CI workflows detected
- ✓Last commit 3d ago
- ✓MIT licensed
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: onboard a second core maintainer
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fd | rust-for-malware-development | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42,886 | 3,483 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Open issues | 182 | 0 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | — |
| Test coverage | 19% | 10% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sharkdp/fd · whitecat18/rust-for-malware-development
Ask AI about sharkdp/fd vs whitecat18/rust-for-malware-development
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.