sharkdp/fd vs yoav-lavi/melody
sharkdp/fd shows stronger signals overall
As of June 2026, fd shows healthier maintenance signals than melody. fd rates Healthy overall while melody rates Mixed. fd last saw a commit 1 month ago with 17+ active contributors, while melody last saw a commit 1 year ago with 4+ active contributors. Both use the Apache-2.0 license. Neither has known critical or high-severity CVEs in its dependency tree.
Informational only. RepoPilot summarises public signals at the time of analysis. Not professional, security, or legal advice.
sharkdp/fd →
Healthy across the board
Permissive license, no critical CVEs, actively maintained — safe to depend on.
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Concentrated ownership — top contributor handles 53% of recent commits
- ✓Last commit 5d ago
- ✓17 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
yoav-lavi/melody →
Stale — last commit 1y ago
last commit was 1y ago; top contributor handles 97% of recent commits
Has a license, tests, and CI — clean foundation to fork and modify.
Documented and popular — useful reference codebase to read through.
No critical CVEs, sane security posture — runnable as-is.
- ⚠Stale — last commit 1y ago
- ⚠Small team — 4 contributors active in recent commits
- ⚠Single-maintainer risk — top contributor 97% of recent commits
- ✓4 active contributors
- ✓Apache-2.0 licensed
- ✓CI configured
- ✓Tests present
What would improve this?
- →Use as dependency Mixed → Healthy if: 1 commit in the last 365 days
Computed from maintenance signals — commit recency, contributor breadth, bus factor, license, CI, tests
Signal-by-signal breakdown
| fd | melody | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 42,886 | 4,747 |
| Last commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Open issues | 182 | 9 |
| Has tests | ✓ | ✓ |
| Has CI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Test coverage | 19% | 6% |
| Dependency CVEs | No CVEs | No CVEs |
| Architecture grade | — | — |
| Cycles | — | — |
| Bottom-line | Healthy signals | Mixed signals |
Want the full analysis? sharkdp/fd · yoav-lavi/melody
Ask AI about sharkdp/fd vs yoav-lavi/melody
Open the chat with a comparison question pre-filled.